Stuart,

>I'm using a RAD
>tool. Meaning it's point and click on fields and
>tables and the code is generated automagically.  The
>one problem I've run into is the RAD tool doesn't have
>the auto capabilities to allow multiple insert
>transactions into the same table on one "page".  To
>allow 5 titles I need 5 pages.  From a users
>standpoint, it's not horrible, but not the best.

>So, now I'm podering a Many to Many, but I realize
>there would need to be multiple Member_Title tables,
>Member_Title1, Member_Title2, Member_Title3, etc.

Sounds like a dreadul idea, breaks several relational rules and will make
more problems down the road &c. Why not lose the RAD tool, find a better
one?

PB

  ----- Original Message -----
  From: Stuart Felenstein
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Friday, August 27, 2004 8:33 AM
  Subject: Many to Many: Does this make sense ?


  I've hit on this subject before but I want to redefine
  and get some feedback.

  Right now I have a table called "Member_Titles"
  Members having multiple titles can put them in the
  datbases. I allow up to 5 to be held by the user and
  have a count() by ID to test before allowing
  insertion.

  Here's my problem.  For the web side of things (and
  this is a database related question), I'm using a RAD
  tool. Meaning it's point and click on fields and
  tables and the code is generated automagically.  The
  one problem I've run into is the RAD tool doesn't have
  the auto capabilities to allow multiple insert
  transactions into the same table on one "page".  To
  allow 5 titles I need 5 pages.  From a users
  standpoint, it's not horrible, but not the best.

  So, now I'm podering a Many to Many, but I realize
  there would need to be multiple Member_Title tables,
  Member_Title1, Member_Title2, Member_Title3, etc.

  From a join angle, I guess I can live with it,
  provided the smoke and mirrors for my users are there.
   My concern is the query part.
  With only the one Member_Title table, the search is
  relatively simple,

  "select title from member.title
  where title = jerl;"

  from the M2M,
  I gather it's going to be
  "select title from member.title1,member.title2, etc
  where title = jerk;"

  Anything else I should be considering here and does it
  make sense to change the schema in this way ?
  I have 2 other similar forms with one holding 5
  records.

  Thank you,
  Stuart

  --
  MySQL General Mailing List
  For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
  To unsubscribe:
http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to