[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> I'm wondering whether or not I should implement fulltext searching for 2 letter 
> words within a product database (HP, TV, G5, LG, etc)...  My searchable text is 
> currently about 600Mb and a 3-letter fulltext index is consuming about 420Mb.
> 
> Is the trade-off for user convience vs. performance worth it?  In general, how much 
> will performance decrease?  Or should I look for alternatives such as a 2-letter 
> keyword table that I build on my own?  Or do most of you just let 2-letter words 
> slide?

Building a keywords table is a more proper way I believe. But - try enabling
2-letters index first, it may not be a slowdown for you. 





-- 
For technical support contracts, goto https://order.mysql.com/?ref=ensita
This email is sponsored by Ensita.net http://www.ensita.net/
   __  ___     ___ ____  __
  /  |/  /_ __/ __/ __ \/ /    Egor Egorov
 / /|_/ / // /\ \/ /_/ / /__   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/_/  /_/\_, /___/\___\_\___/   MySQL AB / Ensita.net
       <___/   www.mysql.com




-- 
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:    http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to