On Fri, Sep 17, 2004 at 04:01:53PM +0300, Egor Egorov wrote: > Jeremy Zawodny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> I can verify that a quad opteron 2.2 runs about a million times > >> better than a quad xeon 3.06. The opteron can handle more than 3 > >> gigs of memory which is a 32 bit limitation. Right now in my quad > >> opteron we have 32 gigs of memory and MySQL is using 16.8 gigs of > >> the memory. > >> > >> We run fedora core 2, with the rpm built by MySQL. We don't run anything > >> else any longer. > > > > And we've had good but limited experiences so far with 64 bit FreeBSD > > 5 on amd64 (also a quad w/32GB). > > Somewhere in this list I've seen controversial reports about FreeBSD/amd64. > Seems like it's not yet stable and may give unpredictable performance > behaviour, no? > > What's your opinion?
Agreed. FreeBSD's production release is 4.10. The 5.x tree is still a work in progress, much like MySQL 4.1. Jeremy -- Jeremy D. Zawodny | Perl, Web, MySQL, Linux Magazine, Yahoo! <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | http://jeremy.zawodny.com/ [book] High Performance MySQL -- http://highperformancemysql.com/ -- MySQL General Mailing List For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql To unsubscribe: http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
