In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Martijn Tonies" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> This is plain rubbish. See my other example with a more complicated
> view source. When adjusting the view, or extracting a script - the
> view source becomes complete gibberish.

> MS SQL, or Firebird, for example, store the view-source as defined -
> this includes comments, spacing etc etc... In short: it becomes usuable.

> MySQL should do this too. From reading these lists, I think MySQL
> only stores the resulting structure - or something similar - and
> (currently) not the view source. To make views useful, better change
> it... :-)

Nope.  A standards-compliant database is _required_ to store the
structure of its objects in its internal information_schema, not some
SQL string.  Of course MySQL isn't standards-compliant at all, but we
should not make it worse by imitating the quirks of other DBMSs.


-- 
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:    http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to