If it works fine currently, the rule usually is: don't mess with it. :) I would stick with MyISAM if I were you, it should be plenty good enough for such a small table and usage as you described.
If you are experiencing performance issues, I would recommend looking at indexes if you haven't already done so. Atle - Flying Crocodile Inc, Unix Systems Administrator On Tue, 14 Jun 2005, Stembridge, Michael wrote: > I currently use MyISAM on an internal web application server; our data takes > up 10mb at this time, though this is likely to grow substantially in the > coming year. The database sees moderate heavy read and moderate write usage > from 50 users. > > > > We're upgrading our sever from Red Hat 7.3 to SuSE Linux Enterprise 9.0 soon > and have considered migrating to InnoDB as part of our upgrade. I like > the performance increases I've seen documented here > http://www.innodb.com/bench.php, though I'm not sure our environment calls > for InnoDB. Thoughts? > > > > -- MySQL General Mailing List For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql To unsubscribe: http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
