Hy Jay, > You don't show the query you are explaining.
The query is: SELECT * FROM table where id_table2 in (1652272,1652293,1652316,1652362); +-------------+-------+-------+----------------------+ | select_type | table | type | possible_keys | +-------------+-------+-------+----------------------+ | SIMPLE | table | range | PRIMARY,table_idx1| +-------------+-------+-------+----------------------+ +------------+---------+------+------+--------------+ | key | key_len | ref | rows | Extra | +----------- +---------+------+------+--------------+ | table_idx1 | 4 | NULL | 72 | Using where| +------------+---------+------+------+-------------+ > It certainly can't be the one in your previous post below, because column > names don't match. Yes, this is the same, but i hide the real name of table and column for security. PS.: Pardon me for some thing, my english is not very good > Jan Gomes wrote: > > >Hy Jay, > > > >Thanks for you attention. > > > >Show you my structure and EXPLAIN: > > > >CREATE TABLE `table` ( > > `id_table1` int(10) unsigned NOT NULL default '0', > > `id_table2` int(10) unsigned NOT NULL default '0', > > `field1` smallint(5) unsigned NOT NULL default '0', > > `field2` mediumint(8) unsigned NOT NULL default '0', > > `textField` text NOT NULL, > > > > PRIMARY KEY (`id_table1`,`id_table2`), > > KEY `table_idx1` (`id_table2`) > >) ENGINE=MyISAM DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8 PACK_KEYS=1 > > > > > > > > > You don't show the query you are explaining. > It certainly can't be the one in your previous post below, because column > names don't match. > > >+-------------+-------+-------+--------------------+ > >| select_type | table | type | possible_keys | > >+-------------+-------+-------+--------------------+ > >| SIMPLE | table | range | PRIMARY,table_idx1| > >+-------------+-------+-------+--------------------+ > > > >+------------+---------+------+------+-------------+ > >| key | key_len | ref | rows | Extra | > >+----------- +---------+------+------+-------------+ > >| table_idx1 | 4 | NULL | 72 | Using where| > >+------------+---------+------+------+-------------+ > > > > > > > >>Please post your exact table schema using SHOW CREATE TABLE, and your > >>exact query, along with an EXPLAIN SELECT for the query. > >> > >>Thanks! > >> > >>-jay > >> > >>Jan Gomes wrote: > >> > >> > >>>Hy Guys, > >>> > >>>I have a simple structure of tables, howewer has 50 million of registers > >>>and 2,5 GB of data. > >>>The table is MyIsam and has 4 integer fields and 1 Text field, one primary > >>>key with two integer fields > >>>and one btree index with one integer field. > >>> > >>>There is a select in this table using an index(with one integer field), > >>>whith a set value > >>>for this field ( select * from table where field in > >>>(value1,value2,value3,value4,etc) ). > >>> > >>>This select has delay 4s average. > >>> > >>>Is this a good time for the select ? How can I run this select in less > >>>time? > >>> > >>>I had make this optimization: > >>> > >>>1-Compress the index > >>>2-sort the index with myisamchk > >>> > >>> > >>>PS.: This table is read-only, hasn't an insert, update or delete. > >>> > >>> > >>> > > > >============== > >Atenciosamente, > >Jan Gomes - [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- MySQL General Mailing List For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql To unsubscribe: http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]