--- Jimmy Guerrero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello, > > Just to make sure we separate the two... > > > mysql cluster that preforms reads on all the > slaves, and writes only on > the master. > > The above can be used to describe a typical use case > for MySQL Replication. > > In a MySQL Cluster there is no need to load-balance > your reads and writes. > > Thanks, > > Jimmy Guerrero > MySQL, Inc > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Winn Johnston > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Monday, July 24, 2006 3:26 PM > > To: mysql@lists.mysql.com > > Subject: mysql + LVS > > > > How stable has it become to run an instance of > mysql ontop of > > a LVS cluster to produce a massively parrallel > system to be > > used for huge databases? > > > > Back in the day i remember tyring to do it with > mosix, not > > sure where they are now a days. but either way i > am looking > > for some current information on the subject. > > > > I know this differs from the idea that you can > have a mysql > > cluster that preforms reads on all the slaves, and > writes > > only on the master. > > > > thanks > > winn johnston ok so LVS is not what i am looking for. I have been reading about some software hacks that allow mysql to use shared memory spread out over a few machines. scenerio, Huge database, over 7 million records. And a high ratio of writes vs reads. Idealy i would like to have the entire database in RAM. Does anyone have any experience running a database this big? can anyone offer a suitalbe setup? I have taken a look at the wikipedia setup http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_servers#Overall_system_architecture thanks -winn johnston __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com -- MySQL General Mailing List For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql To unsubscribe: http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
