does it have the same network speed as your old server.
On 9/25/08, Carles Pina i Estany <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hello, > > On Sep/24/2008, Phil wrote: > > Just a wild guess but, did you perhaps change the filesystem to a > > journalling filsystem when moving to the different server? > > mount reports the same (ext3) > > > I once accidently moved my database from an ext2 to an ext3 partition and > it > > took me a while to figure out the degradation of queries.. > > I have problems reading (selecting) and without any writing disk > activity (I mean, no temporary tables, etc.). Journaling could affect > writing but not reading, no? > > But I already thought about it :-) and tune2fs -l /dev/partition in both > servers reports something different: > > New one: > Filesystem features: has_journal resize_inode dir_index filetype > needs_recovery sparse_super large_file > > Old one: > Filesystem features: has_journal filetype needs_recovery > sparse_super large_file > > I think that this "resize_inode" is not a problem. I don't know why > appears "needs_recovery". Both filesystems are "Clean", etc. > > Thanks for your idea, do we have more ideas? :-) or anything else to > check... > > -- > Carles Pina i Estany GPG id: 0x17756391 > http://pinux.info > > -- > MySQL General Mailing List > For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql > To unsubscribe: http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
