is /tmpdir parameter on both machines using the default value

On 9/25/08, Carles Pina i Estany <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Hello,
>
> On Sep/25/2008, Ananda Kumar wrote:
> > does it have the same network speed as your old server.
>
> yes, it has. But I'm running the query from localhost :-) (socket
> connection). Even, the query only returns one number and I don't have
> any federated tables, etc.
>
> >
> > On 9/25/08, Carles Pina i Estany <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > On Sep/24/2008, Phil wrote:
> > > > Just a wild guess but, did you perhaps change the filesystem to a
> > > > journalling filsystem when moving to the different server?
> > >
> > > mount reports the same (ext3)
> > >
> > > > I once accidently moved my database from an ext2 to an ext3 partition
> and
> > > it
> > > > took me a while to figure out the degradation of queries..
> > >
> > > I have problems reading (selecting) and without any writing disk
> > > activity (I mean, no temporary tables, etc.). Journaling could affect
> > > writing but not reading, no?
> > >
> > > But I already thought about it :-) and tune2fs -l /dev/partition in
> both
> > > servers reports something different:
> > >
> > > New one:
> > > Filesystem features:      has_journal resize_inode dir_index filetype
> > > needs_recovery sparse_super large_file
> > >
> > > Old one:
> > > Filesystem features:      has_journal filetype needs_recovery
> > > sparse_super large_file
> > >
> > > I think that this "resize_inode" is not a problem. I don't know why
> > > appears "needs_recovery". Both filesystems are "Clean", etc.
> > >
> > > Thanks for your idea, do we have more ideas? :-) or anything else to
> > > check...
> > >
> > > --
> > > Carles Pina i Estany            GPG id: 0x17756391
> > >        http://pinux.info
> > >
> > > --
> > > MySQL General Mailing List
> > > For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
> > > To unsubscribe:
> http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > >
> --
> Carles Pina i Estany            GPG id: 0x17756391
>        http://pinux.info
>

Reply via email to