what if you had no issues of scaling, which would have less access time, file system or database?
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 1:54 AM, Arthur Fuller <fuller.art...@gmail.com> wrote: > I second that emotion (don't store the images in the data file: just store > the paths to said images). Why? Because in the event of an updated image it > is more hassle than it is worth, to drop the old image and replace it with > the new one; if what you store is a simple pointer to an image file, lots of > this work goes away. > > A. > -- skype name : mossplix twitter: @mugisha -- MySQL General Mailing List For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql To unsubscribe: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql?unsub=arch...@jab.org
