On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 3:05 PM, Krishna Chandra Prajapati < prajapat...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The below link shows the benchmark between different web servers ( apache, > niginx, cherokee). > Irrelevant to this list, but I'll bite: there is no detail whatsoever on the configuration of the various software. It also only tests the repeated delivery of one html file, presumably static and identical across the servers. Were the servers forked or threaded, how many concurrent clients did they allow, what modules were loaded, how do the respective servers respond to different filesizes, to various kinds of dynamic content, et cetera ad nauseam. All we know from this, is that Cherokee is your best choice if you want to serve a site with only one, static page without images. -- Bier met grenadyn Is als mosterd by den wyn Sy die't drinkt, is eene kwezel Hy die't drinkt, is ras een ezel
