On 10/01/12 15:41, Chris Tate-Davies wrote:
On 10/01/12 13:34, Johan De Meersman wrote:
----- Original Message -----
From: "Johnny Withers"<joh...@pixelated.net>
Security through obscurity?
That sentence has been overused way too much. If you want to remove
all obscurity from your security, just publish your passwords and
private keys.
If none of your MySQL (or samba) servers are open to untrusted
networks, why do you need to hide this information.
Because even on a trusted network you can have untrusted agents.
Think malcontent employees, viruses, et cetera. Security comes in
layers, the more the better - although I do agree that this
particular layer is not the first priority.
Indeed, have a read of http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defence_in_depth
Sorry, wrong link, this is the right one:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defense_in_depth_(computing)
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defense_in_depth_%28computing%29>
-----------------------------
Registered Office: 15 Stukeley Street, London WC2B 5LT, England.
Registered in England number 1421223
This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain privileged,
proprietary, or otherwise private information. If you have received it in
error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the original. Any other
use of the email by you is prohibited. Please note that the information
provided in this e-mail is in any case not legally binding; all committing
statements require legally binding signatures.
http://www.inflightproductions.com