Keep joining I think. In the absence of intersect (which incurs the cost of
a query per type anyhow ), this join pattern is the only option I can think
of.

On 2012-11-22 10:01 AM, "Neil Tompkins" <neil.tompk...@googlemail.com>
wrote:

Michael,

Thanks this kind of works if I'm checking two types.  But what about if I
have 5 types ?

On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 2:53 PM, Michael Dykman <mdyk...@gmail.com> wrote:

> >
> > response did not go to the list..
> >
> >
> > I assume that you mean the id must be associated with bo...
>
> >
> >
> > --
> >  - michael dykman
> >  - mdyk...@gmail.com
> >
> >  May the Source be with you.
> >
>
> > --
> > MySQL General Mailing List
> > For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
> > To unsubscribe...
>

Reply via email to