I like MySQL, and I'm fairly new at it, but if I were to need to store and
retrieve tens of Gb's, I would want an IBM AS/400. Base configurations are
quite reliable, and you can easily add RAID and other types of redundant
support, up to and including redundant machines. I work with numerous
hospitals and it is their preferred platform for storing their
financials (AR/AP/GL/Payroll) as well as their medical records.
I will stress that this is my opinion, and I realize that it may not be a
popular one on this forum -- You are, of course, entitled to yours.
At 09:51 PM 7/18/01 +0400, Alexander Chernienko wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>I'm currently writing proposals for a customer who want to hire our little
>programming team for creating corporate information system, wich includes
>huge database with number of records between 1-10 millions (incl. blobs -
>pictures). Expected database size is tens of Gb.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Before posting, please check:
http://www.mysql.com/manual.php (the manual)
http://lists.mysql.com/ (the list archive)
To request this thread, e-mail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To unsubscribe, e-mail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Trouble unsubscribing? Try: http://lists.mysql.com/php/unsubscribe.php
