HAVING worked OK thus .....
-
> What would this mean? The WHERE clause is what determines what rows
> will be used in the GROUP BY functions, e.g. MIN(). How do you know
> what rows to use when you need to know what rows to use before you
> can figure out the criteria for what rows to use?
> Trying to express in words what you wish to accomplish, I'd say that
> you want the smallest of all my_column such that this value is greater
> than ten. This would be equivalent to WHERE my_column > 10, but if
> that's what you want I suppose you wouldn't be asking.
>
> Someone suggested HAVING, but as far as I can see using HAVING to
> accomplish MIN(column)>constant is equivalent to WHERE column>constant.
>
> //C - not wearing his glasses
>
> --
>  Carl Troein - Círdan / Istari-PixelMagic - UIN 16353280
>  [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://pixelmagic.dyndns.org/~cirdan/
>  Amiga user since '89, and damned proud of it too.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Before posting, please check:
>    http://www.mysql.com/manual.php   (the manual)
>    http://lists.mysql.com/           (the list archive)
>
> To request this thread, e-mail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To unsubscribe, e-mail
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Trouble unsubscribing? Try: http://lists.mysql.com/php/unsubscribe.php
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
Before posting, please check:
   http://www.mysql.com/manual.php   (the manual)
   http://lists.mysql.com/           (the list archive)

To request this thread, e-mail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To unsubscribe, e-mail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Trouble unsubscribing? Try: http://lists.mysql.com/php/unsubscribe.php

Reply via email to