Robert Sundström writes:
>
> Most stable commercial products exposes the opposite behavior. It may be
> the case that MySQL performs pretty well in single (or few) user cases, but
> the commercial alternatives will, in my experience, in most cases beat
> MySQL on 3-5 users and above.
>
Only few small comments.
The above is not true. Take a look at InnoDB benchmarks on InnoDB site.
> It is also the case that most commercial products supports better
> optimization methods than MySQL. Two important things are caching statement
> compilations at the server and stored procedures. If I have a performance
> problem in my database it is often the case that I can improve things by
> putting some SQL-code in a stored procedure.
cacheing queries will be soon release in 4.0 branch and stored
procedures are available via myperl, which should be found on our
portals pages.
--
Regards,
__ ___ ___ ____ __
/ |/ /_ __/ __/ __ \/ / Mr. Sinisa Milivojevic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
/ /|_/ / // /\ \/ /_/ / /__ MySQL AB, Fulltime Developer
/_/ /_/\_, /___/\___\_\___/ Larnaca, Cyprus
<___/ www.mysql.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Before posting, please check:
http://www.mysql.com/manual.php (the manual)
http://lists.mysql.com/ (the list archive)
To request this thread, e-mail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To unsubscribe, e-mail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Trouble unsubscribing? Try: http://lists.mysql.com/php/unsubscribe.php
