Patrick,

----- Original Message -----
From: "Patrick Hsieh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Heikki Tuuri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, April 06, 2002 10:43 AM
Subject: Re: InnoDB is better than MyISAM ?


> Hello "Heikki Tuuri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>
> Where can I find InnoDB Hot Backup product?

you can join the InnoDB Hot Backup beta testing program at
http://www.innodb.com/hotbackup.html

Since no bugs have been reported from ibbackup-0.34 by any of the beta
testers, Innobase Oy may declare ibbackup stable already during this month.

Best regards,

Heikki Tuuri
Innobase Oy
---
InnoDB - transactions, row level locking, and foreign key support for MySQL
See http://www.innodb.com, download MySQL-Max from http://www.mysql.com



> On Sat, 6 Apr 2002 10:35:33 +0300
> "Heikki Tuuri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi!
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Eric S" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Newsgroups: mailing.database.mysql
> > Sent: Saturday, April 06, 2002 2:10 AM
> > Subject: Re: InnoDB is better than MyISAM ?
> >
> >
> > > On Fri, 5 Apr 2002, BD wrote:
> > >
> > > > At 01:54 PM 4/5/2002, you wrote:
> > > > >I have seen many people saying that InnoDB is a great deal, that
InnoDB
> > > > >rocks, etc. and I am concerced about how much better InnoDB is
compared
> > to
> > > > >MyISAM tables. Can someone tells me wich one is better ? I know
that
> > InnoDB
> > > > >have foreign keys support, but I deal very well without then since
now.
> > > > >
> > > > >My interests are justified becaus eI got out of a very old struct
( DBM
> > +
> > > > >Text Files ) and jumped head first into MySQL - MyISAM tables, but
my
> > site
> > > > >has a good deal of visitors ( about 30.000 unique visitors by day )
and
> > speed
> > > > >and reliability are my primary concerns. I plan to use replication
in
> > MySQL,
> > > > >and I would like to know if InnoDB is better than MyISAM for this.
> >
> > MySQL replication works with InnoDB type tables, and is currently used
at
> > several sites.
> >
> > InnoDB Hot Backup (non-free software) makes it possible to set up a new
> > slave without stopping the master or setting any locks on the master.
This
> > is a useful feature at sites requiring high availability.
> >
> > > One note here is that transactions aren't preserved for replication
with
> > > InnoDB, so you loose part of one of the major advantages of InnoDB.
> > > Rollbacks are O.K., since I don't think that goes out to the slaves
until
> > > the commit, but if the master or slave goes down after part of a
> > > transaction is sent to the slave, you get a partially committed
> > > transaction on the slave.  How critical this is depends on the
> > > application, and still is no worse than MyISAM which has no
transactions
> > > to begin with.
> > >
> > > I think Heikki Tuuri has mentioned plans to get this fixed, though I
think
> > > I remember that he said that the problem was in MySQL, not in the
actual
> > > InnoDB code, which makes sense.
> >
> > A potential embedded license buyer is interested in getting this fixed.
If
> > the deal is closed, we may add the commit marks to the binlog rather
soon.
> >
> > > > Have you ever heard the old saying, "If it ain't broke, don't fix
> > it?".<bg>
> > > >
> > > > If your website is mainly for read access to your database then
you're
> > not
> > > > going to need InnoDb.
> > >
> > > Agreed 100%, but it doesn't hurt too much (except for index sizes) on
> > > readonly databases, so on our production system, we standardized on
InnoDB
> > > for all tables for consistency, though we will allow for exceptions
for
> > > tables that need features that aren't in InnoDB yet, such as full text
> > > searching.
> > >
> > > > InnoDb inserts (for a single user) are much slower (for me it is
> > > > around 10x slower) than MyISAM because InnoDb does a lot more work.
> > >
> > > This was not my experience.  Without batching the commits, InnoDB lost
out
> > > to MyISAM on our initial testing by about 1.5x rather than 10x.
> > >
> > > However, when I committed every 100 or so inserts, InnoDB beat out
MyISAM
> > > by a small (25%) margin.  This was with a single user hitting the
> > > database, a perl program that read in a text file, split it into
fields,
> > > and stuffed it into the database one record at a time (identical
programs
> > > except for handling the commits()).
> > >
> > > Now, this wasn't normal database activity, pure inserts into a freshly
> > > created table, but the results were still quite impressive.  Also, I'm
> > > dealing with single-user activity, so there may have been some
> > > differences there as well.
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> > Heikki Tuuri
> > Innobase Oy
> > ---
> > InnoDB - transactions, row level locking, and foreign key support for
MySQL
> > See http://www.innodb.com, download MySQL-Max from http://www.mysql.com
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Before posting, please check:
> >    http://www.mysql.com/manual.php   (the manual)
> >    http://lists.mysql.com/           (the list archive)
> >
> > To request this thread, e-mail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Trouble unsubscribing? Try: http://lists.mysql.com/php/unsubscribe.php
>
> --
> Patrick Hsieh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> GPG public key http://pahud.net/pubkeys/pahudatpahud.gpg
>



---------------------------------------------------------------------
Before posting, please check:
   http://www.mysql.com/manual.php   (the manual)
   http://lists.mysql.com/           (the list archive)

To request this thread, e-mail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To unsubscribe, e-mail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Trouble unsubscribing? Try: http://lists.mysql.com/php/unsubscribe.php

Reply via email to