Hi !

Thank You for the response !

I wrote in my original message that the program 
is running on Solaris 8 (sparc).
And I'm aware of Solaris quite special memory
handling. And if I got It right, Solaris never frees memory
to system but it still frees memory to same process that
originally allocated it. So, the maximum allocated memory
should then be == the largest block of memory allocated
at given time.
however, "my code" has ever allocated more than maybe 1 MB
and even if it never allocates memory, it's still growing

I also write a dummy-app to test the theory.
I allocated and freed 100 MB in a loop.
In Solaris the first loop took all 100MB and it got never
released. But the 100MB remains constant over the next
5 - 6 loops.
The exactly same code in Linux RH7.2 shows that memory
is released between loops just like you say.

so I don't think it's solaris-problem. 
Ofcource it can still be "my code" but I have not found 
the problem...
So I took a chance and passed this question to list.
Maybe somebody else have had the same problem??
Maybe libmysqlclient is not designed to be used in a
daemon process??
It definitely is something wrong somewhere. 
40 - 50 MB in a week is not normal, or what You think ??

I'will test hoard library asap, lets see what happens !

Thank You for Reading.

=d0Mi=

---- Original Message -----
Date: 25-Apr-2002 18:30:57 +0200
From: Rick Flower <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:  MySQL Mailing List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re:  Re: memory leaks in libmysqlclient.

> dOMi writes:
> 
> >However, after only a week the memory usage ocf this process
> >has been grown to 40 - 50 MB so there's have to leakage somewhere.
> 
> What you *may* be seeing is standard memory fragmentation that many
> Unix' systems have with the standard allocator.. You don't mention
> what platform you're on -- I'm assuming Unix.  We've seen some of
> our in-house software running for weeks at a time run into issues
> such as this.  While there were some minor leaks in our case, they
> just didn't account for the large amounts of overhead/process size
> over time.  It really depends on what is being done behind the scenes
> with allocations, etc..  If you're on a Linux system, the standard
> allocator on that platform is better than most about keeping those
> sorts of things from happening...  If all else fails, you could
> always plug something like Hoard in just for fun to see if the problem
> goes away (it's free)..
> 
> Hoard : http://www.cs.utexas.edu/users/emery/hoard/
> 
> -- Rick
> 
> spamfilter : sql,query
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Before posting, please check:
>    http://www.mysql.com/manual.php   (the manual)
>    http://lists.mysql.com/           (the list archive)
> 
> To request this thread, e-mail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To unsubscribe, e-mail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Trouble unsubscribing? Try: http://lists.mysql.com/php/unsubscribe.php
> 
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Before posting, please check:
   http://www.mysql.com/manual.php   (the manual)
   http://lists.mysql.com/           (the list archive)

To request this thread, e-mail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To unsubscribe, e-mail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Trouble unsubscribing? Try: http://lists.mysql.com/php/unsubscribe.php

Reply via email to