On Thu, May 30, 2002 at 02:30:07PM -0500, Philip Molter wrote: > On Thu, May 30, 2002 at 10:43:58AM -0700, Jeremy Zawodny wrote: > : Heikki, > : > : That reminds me of an InnoDB wish-list item I have. I like the level > : of detail provided in the InnoDB monitor output. However, I'd really > : like to be available via MySQL rather than just in the logs. That > : will make it a lot easier to collect the data remotely and write apps > : that can monitor and make use of the data. > : > : Have you given any thought to that? (I have no idea what the effort > : would be like, but it's can't hurt to ask...) > > Just for the record, we second that notion. It's a pain in the > ass using the InnoDB table monitor simply because it dumps so much > output into the log files. There are times when we just want to > grab the status at a particular moment, like how one would do SHOW > TABLE STATUS or SHOW PROCESSLIST.
Right... Something along the lines of SHOW INNODB STATUS would be excellent. Jeremy -- Jeremy D. Zawodny, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Technical Yahoo - Yahoo Finance Desk: (408) 349-7878 Fax: (408) 349-5454 Cell: (408) 685-5936 MySQL 3.23.51: up 0 days, processed 21,365,291 queries (302/sec. avg) --------------------------------------------------------------------- Before posting, please check: http://www.mysql.com/manual.php (the manual) http://lists.mysql.com/ (the list archive) To request this thread, e-mail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To unsubscribe, e-mail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Trouble unsubscribing? Try: http://lists.mysql.com/php/unsubscribe.php
