Hi! I have to correct: if you put
[mysqld] skip-innodb skip-bdb to your my.cnf, then -Max uses only about 1.5 MB more memory than plain MySQL, because of a larger executable. MyISAM tables in -Max are as reliable as in plain MySQL. It is the same source code. Best regards, Heikki Innobase Oy ....... Petre, Monday, July 01, 2002, 9:26:49 AM, you wrote: PA> Probably a stupid question, but which is best to have on ones server, PA> the "old" mysql, or max. I.O.W, if you install MAX and never use innodb PA> or berkeley tables, will it be equivalent to a normal mysql installation PA> wrt performance and stability? PA> I'm asking from an ISP's point of view, if that makes any difference ( PA> obviously if from developer it will depend on the needs of the app..) MySQL-Max binary is larger. It takes a lot more memory and it is useless without usage of InnoDB and/or BDB. -- For technical support contracts, goto https://order.mysql.com/?ref=ensita This email is sponsored by Ensita.net http://www.ensita.net/ __ ___ ___ ____ __ / |/ /_ __/ __/ __ \/ / Egor Egorov / /|_/ / // /\ \/ /_/ / /__ [EMAIL PROTECTED] /_/ /_/\_, /___/\___\_\___/ MySQL AB / Ensita.net <___/ www.mysql.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- Before posting, please check: http://www.mysql.com/manual.php (the manual) http://lists.mysql.com/ (the list archive) To request this thread, e-mail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To unsubscribe, e-mail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Trouble unsubscribing? Try: http://lists.mysql.com/php/unsubscribe.php