Well. Good to know. So I guess the only alternative would be to generate keys by date/time? I was hoping to avoid that. I am still worried about the timestamp type not having good enough resolution. Seconds are pretty broad.
Thanks, Eric >You're asking for trouble. :-) > >AUTO_INCREMENTS are not safe for use in a mutli-master environment. >The scenario you painted will result in a primary key violation on the >master when it reads the value inserted on the slave. > >Jeremy >-- >Jeremy D. Zawodny, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Technical Yahoo - Yahoo Finance >Desk: (408) 349-7878 Fax: (408) 349-5454 Cell: (408) 685-5936 > >MySQL 3.23.51: up 34 days, processed 779,275,123 queries (258/sec. avg) > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >Before posting, please check: > http://www.mysql.com/manual.php (the manual) > http://lists.mysql.com/ (the list archive) > >To request this thread, e-mail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To unsubscribe, e-mail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Trouble unsubscribing? Try: http://lists.mysql.com/php/unsubscribe.php Leading Edge Marketing Inc. 250-360-2992 --------------------------------------------------------------------- Before posting, please check: http://www.mysql.com/manual.php (the manual) http://lists.mysql.com/ (the list archive) To request this thread, e-mail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To unsubscribe, e-mail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Trouble unsubscribing? Try: http://lists.mysql.com/php/unsubscribe.php
