On Thu, Aug 22, 2002 at 02:40:54PM +1000, Jerry van Leeuwen wrote: > > I find myself in the position where I really would like to use 4.0.x in a > production environment where currently 3.23.x is being used. (Mainly because > of the ability of 4.0.x to use indexes on ORDER BY ... DESC, which are > currently just too slow).
That's why we're running it on our slaves. I just put 4.0.3 on 2 of them earlier today. (Well, *my* build of 4.0.3, but I suspect that it's really close to the offical one coming out.) I hope to upgrade the master soon too... > What I need to know is how stable can I consider the 3.23.x features to be > inside 4.0.x? ... have there been (m)any recent bugs in the 4.0.x tree for > features that used to work fine in 3.23.x? I've found 4.0.x to be solid. We've run hundreds of millions of queries thru it so far. The ORDER BY optimizaiton is great. And we've begun using the query cache in demand mode--very nice too. Jeremy -- Jeremy D. Zawodny | Perl, Web, MySQL, Linux Magazine, Yahoo! <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | http://jeremy.zawodny.com/ MySQL 3.23.51: up 15 days, processed 323,375,166 queries (235/sec. avg) --------------------------------------------------------------------- Before posting, please check: http://www.mysql.com/manual.php (the manual) http://lists.mysql.com/ (the list archive) To request this thread, e-mail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To unsubscribe, e-mail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Trouble unsubscribing? Try: http://lists.mysql.com/php/unsubscribe.php
