Jeremy,

Thanks for replying. It's CPU bound.

The 64 bit version has improved things a little - about 5-10%.

I just expected an enterprise server to be faster than a laptop running
win2k with an IDE, Tomcat, Outlook, Office all at the same time...

I now know better.  I'm thinking of putting a fast Intel Linux box behind
the sun box as a database server, and leaving the sun to run apache and
tomcat.  Hopefully this will give me the best of both worlds.

Thanks again,
Andy

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jeremy Zawodny [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 14 January 2003 18:50
> To: Andy Eastham
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Solaris Performance
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 03:34:29PM -0000, Andy Eastham wrote:
> >
> > I've got a mysql application that was developed on win32 and
> linux that is
> > now going to be deployed on a Sun E250 Solaris 9 box with 3
> 36Gb non raided
> > SCSI disks.  No problem I thought - the performance is fine on my PIII
> > 850MHz laptop, so it will rock on an E250...
>
> I'm not sure why you thought that, but...
>
> > Not the case - the laptop seems to be performing at twice the speed
> > of the E250 for a simple select from a table of 55 million simple
> > rows (just 3 floating point numbers per row - the .MYD file is 700Mb
> > and the .MYI index file is 2.7Gb).  It takes 1.2 seconds on the
> > laptop and 2.5 seconds on the sun.  This is a big problem, as I have
> > to do three of these queries plus processing and return in under 10
> > seconds. The laptop takes 6 seconds, the Sun takes 12.  I've got a
> > Linux PIII 933MHz Dell Server which at least half as much again
> > faster than the laptop.
>
> Is it disk or I/O bound?
>
> > I've increased the key cache to 250Mb on the Sun (it's at the
> > default on the laptop), but no radical difference was apparent.
>
> Then it probably wasn't the bottleneck.
>
> Have you looked at system activity to get an idea of what it is (or it
> not) doing?  Disk I/O?  Paging?  CPU?  Memory pressure?
>
> > I'm running the 32 bit variants of MySQL.  Would the 64 bit be any
> > different (Solaris 9 is installed with 32 bit and 64 bit support)?
>
> Maybe.
>
> Jeremy
> --
> Jeremy D. Zawodny     |  Perl, Web, MySQL, Linux Magazine, Yahoo!
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  |  http://jeremy.zawodny.com/
>
> MySQL 3.23.51: up 30 days, processed 1,007,094,133 queries (381/sec. avg)
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Before posting, please check:
>    http://www.mysql.com/manual.php   (the manual)
>    http://lists.mysql.com/           (the list archive)
>
> To request this thread, e-mail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To unsubscribe, e-mail
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Trouble unsubscribing? Try: http://lists.mysql.com/php/unsubscribe.php
>
>



---------------------------------------------------------------------
Before posting, please check:
   http://www.mysql.com/manual.php   (the manual)
   http://lists.mysql.com/           (the list archive)

To request this thread, e-mail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To unsubscribe, e-mail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Trouble unsubscribing? Try: http://lists.mysql.com/php/unsubscribe.php

Reply via email to