On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 11:01:00AM -0700, Dathan Vance Pattishall wrote: > Well I don't feel that 4.0.x is mature enough for my environment quite > yet, although some replication features are actually needed (2 threads > are better then one). > > I might do a small deploy for some search system and even ratio of write > / read systems. Yahoo uses 4.0.x right?
Right, we have a lot of 4.0.xx deployed. > Have any "show stoppers" been experienced since its extensive usage? None that haven't been fixed by now. I'm working with one group here to track down a problem, but we're not sure what the source is yet. Too many variables have been changed. It may be FreeBSD, MySQL, or something else odd going on. > Can the query cache be disabled with something like > skip-query-cache? http://www.mysql.com/doc/en/Query_Cache_Configuration.html > Are 127 errors less apparent in the 4.0.x environment? I really can't make a comparison on that. But 4.0.x is significantly better and faster in many ways. I wouldn't think of going back. Jeremy -- Jeremy D. Zawodny | Perl, Web, MySQL, Linux Magazine, Yahoo! <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | http://jeremy.zawodny.com/ MySQL 4.0.15-Yahoo-SMP: up 3 days, processed 119,860,849 queries (452/sec. avg) -- MySQL General Mailing List For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql To unsubscribe: http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
