Is it just not the case that InnoDB table have to do more as they have more functionality and so take more time?
Simon ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jiří Matějka" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2004 10:38 AM Subject: Speed of MyISAM vs. InnoDB > Hi all, > I'm using mysql 4.0.17 and I have this problem with speed of innodb > database: > > I have simple command like select count(*) from table1, or select field1, > field2 from table1. The table1 and has more than cca 10.000 rows (most of > the fields are integer, only several varchars and several memos) and its > type is InnoDB. Then the query lasts too long, at least several seconds, > sometimes more than 5. If I convert it to MyISAM then the query lasts > usually less then 0.3 second. If the table is small (cca less than 5.000 > rows) then there is not big difference... > Is it normal, that InnoDB isn't able to access large table as quickly as > MyISAM? Or is there any parametr to set to make InnoDB run faster? I need to > use InnoDB because it supports transactions and MyISAM not... > > thx > > Jiri Matejka > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > -- > MySQL General Mailing List > For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql > To unsubscribe: http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- MySQL General Mailing List For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql To unsubscribe: http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
