I have a simple table;
------------------- ID varchar (PK) DATA longblob -------------------
This table is a simple persistence cache for one of our servers. It regularly INSERTs and SELECTs into this table data of approximately 2KB - 200KB, although the majority of inserts are around the 2KB mark.
No fancy queries are ever performed, merely a single SELECT on a given key and no range queries are ever done.
So with that in mind, I just noticed the table was created as a MyISAM. In your experience how does this compare to a table using INNODB? Should it have been created as a INNODB for better performance?
Any thoughts, insights, would be listened to intensely! :)
thanks
-- Alan Williamson, City Planner
w: http://www.BLOG-CITY.com/ e: [EMAIL PROTECTED] b: http://alan.blog-city.com/
-- MySQL General Mailing List For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql To unsubscribe: http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
