Pete Harlan wrote: > My two cents: Just upgrade. We hammer on it pretty hard and the > transition has not only been smooth, it's been a delight. The query > cache, on our load, handles 60% of the queries, which I never imagined > would happen. > > 4.0.18 feels as boringly stable as most released MySQLs :)
Well, I did it. And it went remarkably smooth, just like you said. :) One question, though. I am correct in my assumption that, with the query_cache and all, I can reduce key_buffer_size? It is now set to 64M (against a 128M query_cache_size). My guess is that I will need less of key_buffer_size space. Right? Thanks! - Mark -- MySQL General Mailing List For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql To unsubscribe: http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
