"Per Andreas Buer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> "Joshua Beall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > "Daniel Kasak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> Is there any particular reason why you think the table will need
> >> optimizing, or do you just want everything to be super-optimized?
> >
> > Because when I pull up phpMyAdmin, and it says there is 3,768 bytes of
> > overhead, I just feel *dirty*!  Overhead, after all, is a Very Bad
> > Thing!
>
> Yeah. And doing a full table optimization after updating one single row
> does not at all add any overhead. Not at all. :P

It doesn't count if you are there watching it.  Just like when you watch a
tea kettle; it doesn't boil.




-- 
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:    http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to