For instance, I have a test machine (Mac G4 400Mhz, 512MB, MySQL 4.0.18) that does a three table join with each table having just over 100,000 rows. My initial query took about 12 seconds, but changing my query statement around a little I got it to just under 1 second. Which is pretty good considering the hardware it's on.
What does you explain for the query look like? It's probably doing a full table scan, which means you're bottleneck is the disk.
On May 19, 2004, at 3:26 AM, Mohammed Sameer wrote:
Hi, I'm running a MySQL server on a duel P III 1G, with 2 GB RAM. MySQL 4.0.18 compiled from source.
We have 2 webservers running apache, And this is the backend database server.
The server is really slow.
a select on a table with 138,247 rows takes about 1.6 - 2+ seconds, I have about 50% CPU idle.
using MyISAM table types.
sure I can provide any statistics about the running server.
Do you think that switching to innodb'd help ? Is it a problem with Debian woody ??
Any suggestions are welcomed.
Many thanks!
--
----------------
-- Katoob Main Developer
Linux registered user #224950, ICQ #58475622
--
Don't send me any attachment in Micro$oft (.DOC, .PPT) format please
Read http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
Preferable attachments: .PDF, .HTML, .TXT
Thanx for adding this text to Your signature
--
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.1
GCM/IT d-(++)@ s+(++):->+++ a-- C+++$>++++ UL+++$>++++ P+++$>+++++
L+++(++++)$>+++++ E>+++ W++?>$ N+>+++ o? K-? !w++ !O !M !V !PS@ !PE@ Y+ PGP=+++
t? 5? !X R? tv-- b+@ DI D+ G-- e++>+++ h-->++ !r y?
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
-- Brent Baisley Systems Architect Landover Associates, Inc. Search & Advisory Services for Advanced Technology Environments p: 212.759.6400/800.759.0577
-- MySQL General Mailing List For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql To unsubscribe: http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
