On Wed, May 19, 2004 at 08:47:28AM -0400, Brent Baisley wrote: > Something that small shouldn't really need optimizing. What is the size > of your data (mb?, gb?) and what does your query look like? If you are > doing a wild card search on a large text field without a full text > index, then those times may be the best you're going to get. Many times > it's about optimizing your query statement or you indexes rather than > MySQL settings. mainly we are using 2 databases: 675M for phpbb and 77M for phpnuke. That's not much. Ok, It seems that the actual queries performed by phpbb are optimized.
> For instance, I have a test machine (Mac G4 400Mhz, 512MB, MySQL > 4.0.18) that does a three table join with each table having just over > 100,000 rows. My initial query took about 12 seconds, but changing my > query statement around a little I got it to just under 1 second. Which > is pretty good considering the hardware it's on. > What does you explain for the query look like? It's probably doing a > full table scan, which means you're bottleneck is the disk. > but the server is running on a duel P III with 2 GB RAM and a RAID controller. Do you think there is much to be done, or shall I look for better hardware/or clustering ? > On May 19, 2004, at 3:26 AM, Mohammed Sameer wrote: > > >Hi, > >I'm running a MySQL server on a duel P III 1G, with 2 GB RAM. > >MySQL 4.0.18 compiled from source. > > > >We have 2 webservers running apache, And this is the backend database > >server. > >The server is really slow. > >a select on a table with 138,247 rows takes about 1.6 - 2+ seconds, I > >have about 50% CPU idle. > > > >using MyISAM table types. > > > >sure I can provide any statistics about the running server. > >Do you think that switching to innodb'd help ? Is it a problem with > >Debian woody ?? > >Any suggestions are welcomed. > > > >Many thanks! > > > >-- > >---------------- > >-- Katoob Main Developer > >Linux registered user #224950, ICQ #58475622 > >-- > >Don't send me any attachment in Micro$oft (.DOC, .PPT) format please > >Read http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html > >Preferable attachments: .PDF, .HTML, .TXT > >Thanx for adding this text to Your signature > >-- > >-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- > >Version: 3.1 > >GCM/IT d-(++)@ s+(++):->+++ a-- C+++$>++++ UL+++$>++++ P+++$>+++++ > >L+++(++++)$>+++++ E>+++ W++?>$ N+>+++ o? K-? !w++ !O !M !V !PS@ !PE@ > >Y+ PGP=+++ > >t? 5? !X R? tv-- b+@ DI D+ G-- e++>+++ h-->++ !r y? > >------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------ > > > -- > Brent Baisley > Systems Architect > Landover Associates, Inc. > Search & Advisory Services for Advanced Technology Environments > p: 212.759.6400/800.759.0577 > -- ---------------- -- Katoob Main Developer Linux registered user #224950, ICQ #58475622 -- Don't send me any attachment in Micro$oft (.DOC, .PPT) format please Read http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html Preferable attachments: .PDF, .HTML, .TXT Thanx for adding this text to Your signature -- -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.1 GCM/IT d-(++)@ s+(++):->+++ a-- C+++$>++++ UL+++$>++++ P+++$>+++++ L+++(++++)$>+++++ E>+++ W++?>$ N+>+++ o? K-? !w++ !O !M !V !PS@ !PE@ Y+ PGP=+++ t? 5? !X R? tv-- b+@ DI D+ G-- e++>+++ h-->++ !r y? ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
