--- Greg Willits <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On May 19, 2004, at 1:19 PM, David Blomstrom wrote:
> 
> All "conventional wisdom" I've ever come across for
> this type of 
> application is that there's no advantage to keeping
> the image in the db 
> itself. Just keep them as files on the server, store
> a filename &/or 
> location in the db if necessary, and use your
> middleware to display the 
> images. Its faster, easier to maintain, and easier
> to backup. IMO, 
> storing images in the db just bloats the file and
> complicates all the 
> backup issues.

That's the advice I wanted to hear; one less thing for
me to learn. :)

Thanks.



        
                
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! - Internet access at a great low price.
http://promo.yahoo.com/sbc/

-- 
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:    http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to