Hi, I would agree with Martijn that both features are important. It is like arguing if air conditioning is more important than automatic gearbox when you buy a car. They are both useful but which one you go for depends on where and how you drive the car. Personally, I would have both and also leather seats and cruise control...
It may make an interesting hobby to build your own car but I hate reinventing the wheel. Gilbert -----Original Message----- From: Martijn Tonies [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 28 June 2004 11:39 To: mysql Subject: Re: triggers or stored procedures Hi Carlos, > What is more important? triggers or stored procedures. > > I think that triggers they are a lot more important than stored proc. because stored procs they can be implemented in the front end application. > Then they wouldn't be Stored Procedures anymore would they :-) > In the version 5 should be implemented triggers instead of stored procedures. Both are very much alike - the difference is direct calling compared to triggered calling. Anyway, the language is the same. IMO, they could/should be implemented both in 5.0 With regards, Martijn Tonies Database Workbench - developer tool for InterBase, Firebird, MySQL & MS SQL Server. Upscene Productions http://www.upscene.com -- MySQL General Mailing List For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql To unsubscribe: http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- MySQL General Mailing List For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql To unsubscribe: http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
