On 5/29/05, Michael T. Dean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Phil Vid wrote: > >Is this a bug or am I missing something obvious? I only installed the > >second tuner this weekend so I haven't really messed with it that > >much. > > > > > OK, summarizing my understanding of the situation: Myth recorded > programs 2 and 3 instead of programs 1 & 2. Assuming everything else > you described is correct (priorities, etc.), then perhaps progam 1 > occurs again at a future time. If so, Myth realized that if it recorded > programs 1 and 2, it won't be able to record program 3, but since > program 1 re-airs, it decided to record a future showing.
This is how I would interpret the outcome too - otherwise it likely would have recorded P1 on input 1, and P2 and P3 on input 2 without the 10 minute overrecord. Is the scheduling logic available online in metalanguage anywhere, or is it a case of going through the code to work out what was going on? I think it would be useful if users understood the possible scenarios that can occur with simultaneous and back-to-back recordings and the effects of padding. Nick _______________________________________________ mythtv-users mailing list mythtv-users@mythtv.org http://mythtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mythtv-users