Have i missed your response, Michael? Cant seem to find your respond in the archive.
On Wednesday, August 5, 2009, Tore Lønøy <tore.lo...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hey again Michael, > > Yeah I think av avg value of Pages Output/sec for the last X min would > be the best, much like the CPU check in current build. > > Been away on vacation for a while, hence the latency:-) > > On Thursday, July 9, 2009, Michael Medin <mich...@medin.name> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> The CPU is measured as averages for the last X <time> I could do >> something similar for this. >> >> Which is what I think you want? >> >> Stacking more of them in one go would be possible I guess, I shall look >> into it and see what I can come up with. >> >> // Michael Medin >> >> >> On 2009-07-09 09:44, Tore Lønøy wrote: >> Number 2 seems to be the best choice for me. But I think >> it has to be an average value for the last e.g. 15 min, or something >> similar. >> >> >> The best would be if you could combine a >> check which measured swap usage, free physical memory, committed bytes, >> and pages out/sec, in which an warning / critical error is returned if >> all of them is in a warning or critical state. But that can we done in >> nagios, the only thing i miss now is an average value for pages out/sec. >> >> >> My 2 cents >> >> 2009/7/6 Michael Medin <mich...@medin.name> >> >> Hello >> >> humm, if anyone is interested I could add either: >> 1, option to do average value checks for arbitrary counters (ie. like >> CheckCPU) >> 2, add an option to check Memory\Pages Output/Sec to CheckMem ? >> >> // Michael Medin >> >> >> >> On 2009-07-06 12:55, Tore Lønøy wrote: >> >> >> >> >> Hello naguis usergroup! >> >> I have for some time now tried to find a way to monitor performance >> bottlenecks related to shortage of memory on Windows, with no luck. As >> far my knowlegde of memory bottlenecks concern, using NSClient++ >> command CheckMem and argument physical, is far from enough. Also, >> monitoring windows performance counters, like Memory \ Pages Out/sec is >> no good either since it doesn't support average results. >> >> There is alot of documentation on how to determine that memory is a >> bottleneck, like e.g.: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/555223 >> >> But, for what I understand, using nagios to determine this is hard. >> >> So how do you guys locate memory bottlenecks on windows machines, with >> or without the help of nagios? >> >> Best regards, >> >> Tore >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Nagios-users mailing list >> Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users >> ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting >> any issue. >> ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ Nagios-users mailing list Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null