On 14/01/13 14:41, julian_grunn...@tdwh.co.uk wrote:
Hi - can someone confirm if the following scenario regards service
escalations is correct?
I have a service check that simply performs a TCP check, if it fails
it will email the contact with a defined notification_interval of 5mins.
I also have a serviceescalation defined as follows:
define serviceescalation{
hostgroup_name desktopsnahisservers
service_description DESKTOP SNA SERVICE TCP 4097
first_notification 3
last_notification 0
notification_interval 5
contacts me_at_home
}
If the TCP check continues to fail the service escalation contact
starts to get alerts but the actual contact for the defined service
doesn't.
Is this behaviour to be expected?
As a solution I've simply added the defined service contact to also be
a contact under the serviceescalation section as well.
I'm running Nagios 3.4.3.
Thanks - Julian.
Julian Grunnell | Unix Analyst, Infrastructure | TD Direct Investing
T: +44 (0) 113 346 2824 | M: +44 (0) 7889 352527
Escalations are added and expand the capability of notifications , when
the escalation logics is activated the normal notification logic is
"suspended" and the escalation is the way nagios is processing the alerts.
So if after the 3rd alert only the escalation alert is received - then
the logic is working as it should .
Assaf
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Master Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL, ASP.NET, C# 2012, HTML5, CSS,
MVC, Windows 8 Apps, JavaScript and much more. Keep your skills current
with LearnDevNow - 3,200 step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft
MVPs and experts. SALE $99.99 this month only -- learn more at:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnmore_122412
_______________________________________________
Nagios-users mailing list
Nagios-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users
::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting
any issue.
::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null
