Curtis Villamizar wrote:
FYI -
Just got an email containing the following excerpt.
Dear SIGCOMM SIG Member,
We are pleased to announce something new at the Sigcomm Conference
this year: In addition to posting every paper online, we are
publishing a public review for every paper (written and signed by a
Program Committee member), along with an online discussion
forum. It's free, it's public and it's now available at:
There seems to be a direction toward PC transparency elsewhere so
maybe its not crazy to suggest increased transparency in the NANOG PC.
I thought that the current suggestion was to post comments on all
submitted talks? I will also point out that there is a difference
between a review written and signed by a PC member and the comments used
for internal discussion and acceptance of a talk. I don't like the idea
of posting comments on all proposed talks and I'm not 100% sure of the
benefit of a review per accepted talk but have no real objection to it
if there is benefit.
-Hank
