Lynda wrote: > John Payne wrote: > >> Heh, just reread the message. It's actually not clear that you >> aren't doing the import. >> >> Sorry about the noise.... clarification requested. > > I think that Betty et al might want to consider a follow up message. I > misread this as well, John. Until you commented, I thought that it meant > I'd have to sign up again, which didn't make much sense to me. We will > not be the only two to misunderstand, I suspect.
Although it WOULD be an interesting exercise to understand how many people actually read NANOG. I suspect it is significantly less than the often touted 9000+ subscribers. Of course John is right, the Mailman software will happily unsubscribe any list members that bounce, but that won't address the subscribers taht either delete/discard the nanog mail, or file it into a folder for later follow up. I filter nanog mail off to another folder, and go in every so often to see what's going on, but only really read -futures regularly. I did not see what the new sender address is going to be. That would be a helpful clarification for those of us that have whitelists. -Sean _______________________________________________ Nanog-futures mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-futures
