On May 7, 2008, at 1:25 PM, Richard A Steenbergen wrote: > On Wed, May 07, 2008 at 05:18:04AM -0700, Steve Gibbard wrote: >> For what it's worth, I find the NANOG subject line tag rather useful. >> Most of the ohter mailing lists I'm on have such a tag, and in the >> past >> I've found it annoying that NANOG didn't. > > Ditto, my vote is to keep it.
Wheee... If we are voting.... +1 W > > > -- > Richard A Steenbergen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras > GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 > 2CBC) > > _______________________________________________ > Nanog-futures mailing list > [email protected] > http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-futures > -- "Being the Fun-Police in the global Internet is a thankless - and probably futile - task." -- R. Whittle ("draft-whittle-sram-ip-forwarding-01.txt") Warren Kumari [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Nanog-futures mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-futures
