+1 as well Cheers,
Aaron On Wed, May 07, 2008 at 02:55:17PM -0400, Warren Kumari wrote: > > On May 7, 2008, at 1:25 PM, Richard A Steenbergen wrote: > > > On Wed, May 07, 2008 at 05:18:04AM -0700, Steve Gibbard wrote: > >> For what it's worth, I find the NANOG subject line tag rather useful. > >> Most of the ohter mailing lists I'm on have such a tag, and in the > >> past > >> I've found it annoying that NANOG didn't. > > > > Ditto, my vote is to keep it. > > Wheee... If we are voting.... > > +1 > > W > > > > > > > -- > > Richard A Steenbergen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras > > GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 > > 2CBC) > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Nanog-futures mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-futures > > > > -- > "Being the Fun-Police in the global Internet is a thankless - and > probably futile - task." > -- R. Whittle ("draft-whittle-sram-ip-forwarding-01.txt") > > Warren Kumari > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > -- > Nanog-futures mailing list > [email protected] > http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-futures -- Aaron Hughes [EMAIL PROTECTED] (703) 244-0427 Key fingerprint = AD 67 37 60 7D 73 C5 B7 33 18 3F 36 C3 1C C6 B8 http://www.bind.com/ _______________________________________________ Nanog-futures mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-futures
