-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 - -- Alex Pilosov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>By now it's no news to anyone on -futures or the main list that the SC >unanimously decided to dissolve the current Mailing List Committee (to >be blunt, fire all existing MLC members) and start anew. I guess my first question is: Is a mailing list "committee" really needed? This seemed like a mistake when it was first imposed, and now it seems like a larger mistake. Committees always seem to fail. Gone are the free & easy days, I suppose. - - ferg -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP Desktop 9.6.3 (Build 3017) wj8DBQFIKpNVq1pz9mNUZTMRApPDAJ9S6OMdZn3vVMZhol/UY5cM/x00IQCcDt6b bYogQTRTqe+uy7RfH7/o5wc= =/ygl -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- "Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson Engineering Architecture for the Internet fergdawg(at)netzero.net ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/ _______________________________________________ Nanog-futures mailing list Nanog-futures@nanog.org http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-futures
