On 22 May 2008, at 20:31, Simon Lyall wrote: > On Thu, 22 May 2008, Jim Popovitch wrote: >> On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 1:39 PM, Jason J. W. Williams >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Has anyone else noticed that the [NANOG] prefix has been missing >>> intermittently from the list traffic over the last couple of days? >> >> This was planned, and then announced approx 5 days ago. You are >> subscribed to nanog-announce, right? ;-) > > I don't remember seeing this. Could the announce archives be made > public?
I also didn't receive it, for what tiny amount that is worth (FWTATW). I notice that the loss of [NANOG] makes me curiously happy, as well as happily curious. Joe _______________________________________________ Nanog-futures mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-futures
