James R. Cutler wrote: > The announcement was made to nanog-announce, but not to nanog. I would > expect that there are scads more readers of nanog than of nanog announce.
Interesting. I just realized that I've probably never been subscribed to nanog-announce, since all the important stuff was cross-posted to nanog, and I didn't see the point of seeing it twice. Now I wonder what else I've missed by doing that. Dang. Guess I'll have to go off and sign up, now. -- Die Gedanken sind frei _______________________________________________ Nanog-futures mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-futures
