I agree: the occasionally relevant post in an outage thread is worth the time spent on the non-relevant ones.
I too am more troubled by the reporters... -David Barak seph wrote: > Simon Lyall <[email protected]> writes: >> The recent thread about the Level3 outage ( the posts on the outage itself >> not the ongoing discussion ) once again showed that Outage threads are a >> problem area on the NANOG list. >> >> Thoughts? > My personal preference is to just leave it on na...@. It's easier for me > to check that, then check a dozen other things, and it seems > operationally relevant to the list members. I also filter my nanog mail, > I don't find 20 messages much of a burden. > If people feel like they can't speak freely on nanog for fear of being > quoted, I think that's a much bigger problem. Though I'm not sure what > the solution is. > seph > _______________________________________________ > Nanog-futures mailing list > [email protected] > http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-futures _______________________________________________ Nanog-futures mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-futures
