kris foster wrote:
> Hi everyone
>
> I am going to preface this by saying that the MLC appreciates that
> transparency is of the most importance to the community, and that we
> have not lived up to this as completely as we should have.
>
> We have recently been experimenting with thread moderation. The first
> thread to be moderated was the Cogent haiku thread which I mentioned
> during the NANOG 45 community meeting. For trivially off topic threads
> nothing was missed. So the community can see exactly what we have
> applied moderation to, the following is a complete list of regular
> expressions used:
Thank you for your response. I appreciate the MLC taking this so
seriously. I also appreciate that the job of a nanog admin is volunteer
based, and thank-less.
Question:
Is it possible to form a basic policy to preface thread moderation?
Example would be:
1. Email mailing list on the thread, asking for people to respond only
if there is an operational content they wish to share, or refrain from
doing so.
2. Moderate thread (with a waiting period between step #1 and step #2?)
and email the list on the thread mentioning it was moderated.
Then, if anyone has any issues with a specific case, they can discuss it
on nanog-futures.
Thoughts?
Gadi.
_______________________________________________
Nanog-futures mailing list
Nanog-futures@nanog.org
http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-futures
