On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 05:02:58PM -0500, Tim Yocum wrote: > I mailed nanog-support@ earlier today with a suggestion to add a link > to the outages list over on the NANOG site where we direct folks to > other lists for off-topics. Outages are not best tracked on NANOG and > haven't been for a very long time.
+1. I think redirecting traffic to mailop, dns-operations, spam-l or outages (as appropriate) is a fine idea. > I highly doubt any of the traceroutes posted on NANOG (or on the > outages list) were of any value to those troubleshooting the issues > seen today. Something tells me based on the gravity of the issue, > plenty of other data was floating around to help pinpoint the failure. Probably so. Although there's some value in knowing "it's not just me" for many values of "me", which is why I checked the outages list before attempting to perform any diagnosis. ---Rsk _______________________________________________ Nanog-futures mailing list Nanog-futures@nanog.org http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-futures
