On Jun 9, 2009, at 8:58 PM, Randy Bush wrote: >>> Note: topic in the presentation room, not topic at the hotel bar ;-) >> ... which clearly means that you've missed where the real discussions >> happen. > > and only want to discuss what has already been discussed
The original post also said "and is unlikely to be a topic in the NANOG conference", which sounds like it would include anything that is "likely" to be discussed. Back to the original question: Fair attempt, but I think it falls short. It would be closer to say "could possibly be a topic in the conference". But even that falls short, IMHO. There are subjects which are on topic & useful for the mailing list which will never be presented. Besides, I think we have a fine system now. The MLC is doing an outstanding job. Do you not agree? (Randy, don't bother answering, I wasn't asking you. We all know your position - same as spammers, "JHD". I don't like it when they say it either.) -- TTFN, patrick _______________________________________________ Nanog-futures mailing list Nanog-futures@nanog.org http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-futures
