I don't deny that you have some very good questions.   I agree that forthcoming 
transparency would be an excellent thing.

But having been through the creation of a new entity and separation from the 
old entity before, I can see a large number of factors which might be making 
these things difficult:

1.  There's a lot of work to be done creating a new entity.  Who are these 
fulltime paid-for-by-nanog-finances people to do this work?   This is a 
cart->horse problem they have to solve.

2. I agree completely that the new entity should be completely transparent to 
the members.   This is a good idea.   However, I have seen major problems with 
this in the past, where the original entity was unwilling to meet the new 
transparency desires of the new entity.   This makes it very difficult until 
after significant progress in the transition is completed.

So push for transparency for the new organization, but understand that 
transparency from Merit regarding the finances and employee information related 
to NANOG may never become public, and thus meeting minutes held under their 
structure may never become available.

3. If there is a mailing list on the Internet with more (perhaps well-meaning) 
armchair critics, I can't imagine one more.   I applaud the NANOG SC for being 
willing to take on this bunch.  I also absolutely understand why they aren't 
going to write personal responses to every single member asking the same thing. 
  This very quickly becomes personal one-on-one training of the questioner on 
the topics and issues of which they are not familiar.  

I believe that creating a FAQ that attempts to answer the essential questions 
is a good use of their time.

Summary:  This isn't easy.  There's a lot of work to do, given 0 paid workers 
to do it.   Give them a chance to prioritize their first deliverables, read the 
deliverables, and comment on that.

Any complaints about the lack of personal hands-on training (read: direct 
e-mail replies to each question asked) on the issues facing the creation of an 
organization and the issues they face doing it are simply out of line.   They 
could easily expend every moment they have available to work on NANOG doing 
this kind of personal training.

-- 
Jo Rhett
Net Consonance : consonant endings by net philanthropy, open source and other 
randomness


_______________________________________________
Nanog-futures mailing list
Nanog-futures@nanog.org
https://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-futures

Reply via email to