Agreed. NANOG was one of only a few mailing lists I'm on that didn't appropriately mangle the headers. Now it's fixed.
----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com Midwest-IX http://www.midwest-ix.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "William Herrin" <[email protected]> To: "North American Network Operators Group" <[email protected]> Sent: Sunday, March 2, 2025 4:04:28 PM Subject: [NANOG]Re: Scheduled Maintenance Finished On Sun, Mar 2, 2025 at 10:55 AM Niels Bakker <[email protected]> wrote: > | Subject: [NANOG]Re: > > Congrats on completing the move to Mailman 3 but is this Subject line > mangling truly necessary? It has been standard for mailing lists for a quarter of a century now. Isn't it time NANOG caught up with mailing list best practices? Regards, Bill Herrin -- William Herrin [email protected] https://bill.herrin.us/ _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/EOFBQS54XLBBCJLULCNESJMX2L4W4KR2/ _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/27Y3UMWES5M3GNJ3MKV7K75AEYPH6TYM/
