> > Why not using the newsgroup comp.dcom.sys.cisco?
1. Nobody wants to pay for USENET access anymore , unless you're ripping software/media. 2. Free USENET access generally has poor retention and often misses large chunks of messages. It's just extra work for more limited and inconsistent access , compared to the puck mailing lists which have operated very well for decades now, only seeing a recent hiccup because of a server death. On Sat, Aug 9, 2025 at 3:27 PM Marco Moock via NANOG <[email protected]> wrote: > Am 30.07.2025 um 15:26:51 Uhr schrieb Drew Weaver via NANOG: > > > I was a big fan of the > > *[email protected]<mailto:*[email protected]> mailing lists > > that now seem to be completely gone without any indication of whether > > or when they might return. > > > > I've been considering just setting up new ones. > > Another idea: > > Why not using the newsgroup comp.dcom.sys.cisco? > > It already exists and is distributed, so no single operator can shut it > down. > > -- > Gruß > Marco > > Send unsolicited bulk mail to [email protected] > _______________________________________________ > NANOG mailing list > > https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/2D4GUMNKSZE6CNPE6NB55HRRNHY3D3PK/ _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/C3G5CG3S7XBAE4I6LL7YUMSCUVW3XBV2/
