Am 05.11.2025 um 13:03:46 Uhr schrieb Vasilenko Eduard: > > Are you aware that EUI64 is only one way to generate the addresses > > and that the 64 bits can be randomly filled or be static? > Do you mean that random garbage (for privacy) did return 2% resources > to the Internet? These 16 bytes (8 for source and 8 for destination) > are still used not for IP addressing. Does it matter for what it is > used, if it is not IP addressing? IPv6 is 64+bit architecture (a few > bits are used inside subnet)
I do not understand what you are talking about. For IPv6, the subnets that are connected to links should always be /64. Various ways exist to fill the other 64 bit. > > If you want NAT really hard, you can use it with IPv6 too. fd00::/8 > > exist. > Then it is better to use NTP. But IETF makes everything possible to > block it too. Anyway, if NAT (in any form) is blocked then there is > no practical solution for ISP redundancy: There is and I pointed that out. The NAT "redundancy" "solutions" do not offer redundancy. They are a cripple solution. -- Gruß Marco Send unsolicited bulk mail to [email protected]
pgp9PX3Oh_StG.pgp
Description: Digitale Signatur von OpenPGP
_______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list https://lists.nanog.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/7EPNFMPM7BUKH3YI2MYUAUV5YYQAAVEA/
